我的斯诺克台球论坛

[liujiehua]

引自http://www.worldsnooker.com/uk_championship09_news-97734.htm?tid=146

World No 1 O'Sullivan said: "John had chances from 8-2 up but he went off the boil, which was unlike him. To get to 8-8 flattered me and in the end it was the right result, a fair score would have been 9-4. I was hitting the balls too thick or too thin and couldn't see the potting angle, I couldn't even break off. I made a pact with myself at the start of this season not to get excited if I win or disappointed if I lose. Otherwise I'd get annoyed and frustrated and I don't want to spend the rest of my career in that manner."
罗尼说：“老希本来8：2后就一直有机会，但是是我坏了他的好事，能打到8：8我深感荣幸，到了最后是个理所应当的结局，（言下之意，他早就想希会赢，自己只要享受每一杆，对得起观众就行，当时现场很多人高喊罗尼的名字），比赛本应该9：4的！ 我那时（估计8：8最后时刻）打球不是太厚就是太薄，根本找不到击球点，我无法终止这种状态。早在赛季前，我就自己下定决心 不论我输赢与否，都要不以物喜，不以己悲，否则我就会被自己惹恼，而且陷入困境，我不想花费我事业的下半生在那种状态。”

As for the incident in frame 13, O'Sullivan stressed: "I don't know what the rules are, but I didn't foul the black intentionally. I couldn't believe I took so many attempts to hit the yellow. I walked back to my chair and I expected John to be able to pot the red. I was a bit confused as it was a bizarre situation."
对于第13盘的解释，罗尼强调，“虽然我不知道关于那种情况的规则，但是没有故意犯规（对黑球）”我实在无法相信我居然解黄球花了那么多次。（犯规后）我走回座位，希望老希能够可以打红球，对于那个异常古怪的状况，我有点困惑。”
Higgins agreed: "Never in a million years did Ronnie foul deliberately, he is one of the most genuine people in snooker. It's probably never happened to Jan (Verhaas) before and it will probably never happen to him again, it was just a freaky position on the table. He was just applying the rules but maybe it should be left to him to have discretion."
希金斯赞同道：“罗尼（百万年都不会有一次）绝不会故意犯规，他是斯诺克界最有天赋的人。这种情况估计对于来说Jan (Verhaas) （裁判）（也从未遇到，估计以后也是。）空前绝后！ 这只是一个戏剧性的小插曲。他（裁判）只是按规则办事，但是可能应该更慎重些。”
英语太烂，有些意译，肯请批评指正，觉得兄弟们还是看原文更能理解 http://www.worldsnooker.com/uk_champion ... tm?tid=146
要是有哪位仁兄知道有赛后采访的视频请发来啊 呵呵 谢了！！

[avsolution]

具体是啥情况啦，SNK规则是怎样定义这种情况的那：

罗尼连续7杆没解到他报的黄球，

第八杆衣袖碰到黑球，裁判判犯规，罚七分

接下来，应该怎么判那，判谁上来打红球，还是解SNK那？

[张军长]

这种规矩感觉很不对哦

[滂沱大雨]

犯规了就不是无意识解球
于是裁判就不让他继续解了
应该说裁判这样判绝对正确的
规则就是这样
...........
问题在于以后再出现的这种状况
会不会有人故意的采取犯规来回避解球
规则要不要做出相应的修改来防止故意犯规
.............

[Jeremy]

裁判判罚时对的，这是规则的漏洞，希金斯看白球和红球形成贴球，所以往反方向打，打到了蓝色球。
另外一个规则漏洞：如果某球员领先34分，握有球权，台面还剩一颗红球，台面最多还剩35分，但是没有好的进攻机会，他可以将红球打出台面，被罚4分，红球不会摆回台面，这样他还领先30分，而台面只剩下27分了，对手需要做成斯诺克才能赢。而原本红球不出台面，对手则有望刚好清台超1分赢。